The Iraq war continues to be a drain on the American taxpayers’ pocketbooks. So far, the war has
cost the United States $144.4 billion, including $25 billion in the Administration’s FY05 defense
budget signed into law earlier this month. An additional $60 billion is expected in a supplemental
request after the November elections. According to the Defense Department, the cost of
containing Saddam Hussein over 12 years was only $30 billion.

While no one disputes the evil and oppressive nature of Saddam Hussein’s regime, as the 9/11
Commission made clear in its final report, Iraq was not involved in the planning or execution of
the September 11 attacks and did not have a “collaborative operational relationship,” according to
its final report. The September 11 attacks necessitated an increase in homeland security funding
– the Administration’s request for the coming fiscal year is $47.5 billion. However, according to
the Center for American Progress, many homeland security priorities are presently under-funded
or unfunded – port security, airline cargo screening and community policing programs.

More could be done to better secure or eliminate nuclear weapons, material and technology to
prevent terrorists from developing and exploding nuclear or dirty bombs. While progress is being
made in Afghanistan, increased aid faster will give democracy its best chance of taking hold and
help eliminate the flourishing drug trade in Afghanistan that funds global terrorist activities.
Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan have taken their toll on our troops. A larger Army and more
special operations forces would take some of the current strain off the National Guard and
reserves and improve the military’s ability to eliminate actual terrorist safe havens in the future.
These are just a few proposals that would have represented a better investment in America’s
security than the $144.4 billion Iraq “war of choice.”

The question lingers: Could the $144.4 billion spent on Iraq been better used to protect the
American people from terrorist threats? The Center for American Progress offers this answer.

• $7.5 billion to safeguard our ports. The Coast Guard estimates that $7.5 billion is
  needed over ten years to implement the requirements of the 2002 Maritime
  Transportation Security Act, which aims to protect America’s ports and waterways from
  a terrorist attack. Since 9/11, the federal government has allocated less than $500 million
  to counter this threat.
• $4 billion to expedite upgrading the Coast Guard fleet. This investment over the next
  five years would cut in half the 20-year timetable for replacing and upgrading the Coast
  Guard’s fleet of cutters, patrol aircraft, and communications equipment.
• $2 billion to improve cargo security. This would help cover costs associated with the
  Cargo Security Initiative, which deploys customs inspectors to ports around the world to
  screen cargo before it goes to the United States.
• $10 billion to protect all U.S. commercial airliners from shoulder-fired missiles.
  These systems, based on existing military technology, would help reduce the danger from
  the estimated 100,000 shoulder-fired missiles circulating in the world’s black markets.
• $5 billion to purchase state-of-the-art baggage screening machines. This would
  fulfill the Congressional mandate to install in all commercial airports new systems that
  integrate baggage screening and baggage handling. Only eight of the nation’s 440
  airports have the new machines, and the administration has requested only $250 million
  for equipment this year.
• $240 million to equip the airports with walk-through explosive detectors. According
  to the 9/11 commission, it’s still too easy for passengers with hidden explosives to make
  it through airport security.
• $7 billion to put 100,000 police officers the nation’s streets. $7 billion would fully
  fund for five years the 1996 Community Oriented Policing Services program, which was
  designed to put 100,000 new community police officers on America’s streets. The
  administration has cut the funding for the program to $97 million in the proposed FY05
  budget.
• $2.5 billion to increase funding for fire departments. This would double the size of
  the Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program for each of the next five years. President
  Bush requested only $500 million for FY05, a drop from $750 million in FY04. Money
  from the program goes for trucks, protective clothing, hoses, and other equipment.
• $350 million for integrating emergency radio systems nationwide. Equipment to
  patch together existing police, fire, and other public safety radio systems throughout the
  country would cost $350 million.
• $3 billion to secure major roads and rails. $3 billion would secure all the major roads
  and railways in the nation’s largest metropolitan areas. Improving surveillance, training
  railway workers, and developing new explosive detection equipment would increase
  passenger safety. The administration has focused its funding on aviation security, but has
  provided less than $200 million in last year’s budget.
• $30.5 billion to secure from theft the world’s nuclear weapons-grade material.
  Securing the world’s fissile material would enormously reduce the chance that lethal
  weapons-grade material could be made into nuclear and radiological weapons. A 10-year
  $30 billion program would ensure material security and weapon dismantlement in the
  former Soviet Union. Another $500 million would fund a “global cleanout program,”
  aimed at removing dangerous nuclear materials from the most vulnerable nuclear sites
  worldwide.
• $2.25 billion to expedite the work of the Nunn-Lugar Threat Reduction program.
  Doubling this program’s budget each year for the next five years would accelerate Nunn-
  Lugar, which has helped deactivate over 6,000 nuclear warheads in the former Soviet
  Union and the United States. The FY04 Defense budget provided only $450 million for
  the program.
• $24 billion to add two divisions to the Army. With commitments in Iraq and
  Afghanistan, the U.S. Army is increasingly stretched thin. Two additional divisions could
  be added to the Army over the next five years at a cost of $4.8 billion a year. A larger
  army would help take the pressure off America’s overtapped National Guardsmen and
  Reservists.
• $15.5 billion to double the number of active-duty troops in the Special Operations
  Forces. The United States has roughly 25,000 Special Operations Forces. These elite
  military fighting units played a critical role in Afghanistan and continue to be highly
  effective in tracking down terrorists. Doubling the 25,000 troops in the Special
  Operations Forces would cost $7 billion and an additional $8.5 billion would help
  maintain the new forces over the next five years.
• $8.6 billion to rebuild Afghanistan. The government of Afghanistan has said it needs
  $27.6 billion for reconstruction activities over the next seven years such as rebuilding
  infrastructure, education, health, and disarmament programs. The country has received to
  date only $2.9 billion of the $19 billion pledged by the international community. $8.6
  billion over the next seven years would make up this shortfall and help Afghanistan from
  reverting to a haven for terrorists.
• $11 billion to buy Afghanistan’s opium crop. Afghanistan’s illicit opium drug trade
  brings in a profit of $2.3 billion each year, much of which goes to fund terrorist activities.
  A 5-year program to buy Afghanistan’s opium crop would provide initial and continuing
  funding for farmers to permanently shift from growing opium to cultivating other crops
  or starting microenterprises.
• $10 billion to increase U.S. development assistance to the neediest countries. The
  current foreign assistance budget is $19.27 billion, including foreign military funding and
  the State Department’s operating budget. $13.8 billion goes to countries other than Israel,
  Egypt, Jordan, and Pakistan. Increasing the non-military development assistance budget
  by $10 billion over the next five years to countries other than Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and
  Pakistan, would help improve economic opportunities, health care, and education
  worldwide.
• $775 million to dramatically increase public diplomacy. $775 million would
  quadruple America’s public diplomacy efforts in the Arab and Muslim world, as well as
  triple funding for the National Endowment for Democracy, each year for the next five
  years. The United States could use this funding to build bridges in Arab and Muslim
  communities and nations.

************************
Sources:
$144.4 billion for the Iraq War: “Iraq Costs At $119.4 Billion -- And Rising,” Miami Herald, June 2,
2004. In addition, the Administration signed into law an additional $25 billion for Iraq in the FY05
Defense budget.
$2.5 billion per year to contain Saddam Hussein: “Deputy Secretary Paul Wolfowitz Interview with
England Cable News,” March 23, 2003. Wolfowitz stated that it cost the United States roughly $30 billion
for twelve years to contain Saddam Hussein before the Iraq War.
$30.5 billion to secure from theft the world’s nuclear weapons-grade material: “A Report Card on the
Department of Energy’s Nonproliferation Programs With Russia,” Baker-Cutler Commission, January 10,
2001, Secretary of Energy Advisory Board, U.S. Department of Energy. The Commission estimates $3
billion per year for the next ten years for fissile material security and disposition in Russian and the NIS.
“Controlling Nuclear Warheads and Materials: A Report Card and Action Plan,” Matthew Bunn, Anthony
Wier, and John P. Holdren, Nuclear Threat Initiative and the Project on Managing the Atom, Harvard
University, March 2003. The report estimates that $50 million per year for “several years” would
restructure and expedite the “global cleanout” program, removing the dangerous nuclear materials from
sensitive sites worldwide. Funding this for the next ten years would cost $500 million.
$24 billion to add two divisions to the Army: “Six Steps to a Safer America,” by Lawrence Korb, Center
for American Progress, January 29, 2004. The report estimates the cost of adding two divisions at $4.8
billion per year ($1.2 billion for additional 10,000 troops).
$15.5 billion to double the number of active-duty troops in the Special Operations Forces: “U.S.
Operations Forces (SOF): Background and Issues for Congress,” Congressional Research Service, August
15, 2003. The report notes that there is a total of roughly 47,000 SOF units, in addition to the FY03 request
for 2,653. The FY03 request for SOF was $6.7 billion.
$11 billion to buy Afghanistan’s opium crop: “Afghanistan, the other war,” Houston Chronicle, June 20,
2004. The report notes that in 2003, Afghan drug farmers and traffickers earned a profit of $2.3 billion.
$10 billion to protect commercial airplanes from shoulder-fired missiles. “Missile Defenses for U.S. Airliners Are
Within Reach, Contractors Insist,” Caitlin Harrington, Congressional Quarterly, November 13, 2003. According to
Representative John Mica, chairman of the House Transportation Aviation Subcommittee, equipping every plane in the
U.S. commercial fleet with missile defense systems could cost between $6 billion and $10 billion.
$10 billion to dramatically increase U.S. development assistance to the neediest countries. “Foreign
Aid: An Introductory Overview of U.S. Programs and Policy,” Congressional Research Service, April 15,
2004. According to the report, out of a total of $19.27 billion in FY04 foreign aid, $5.44 billion went to
Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and Pakistan. Foreign military funding made up 23.2% of the budget.
$8.6 billion to rebuild Afghanistan: “Building a New Afghanistan: The Value of Success, the Cost of
Failure,” Center on International Cooperation, March 2004. The report notes that $7 billion had been
pledged, before the March-April 2004 Berlin conference, and $2.9 had been disbursed. The report can be
found at: http://www.cic.nyu.edu/pdf/Building.pdf. “Miles to go in Afghanistan,” Center for Strategic and
International Studies, April 2004. At the Berlin conference from March 31-April 1, 2004, Aghan president
Hamid Karzai requested $27.6 billion over the next seven years to cover the cost of essential reconstruction
in Afghanistan. This report also states that an additional $12 billion was pledged by the international
community. The report can be found at: http://csis.org/isp/pcr/0404_milestogo.pdf.
$7.5 billion to safeguard our ports: “New Security Efforts Lagging at Some Ports,” Los Angeles Times,
June 30, 2004. According to the article, “the Coast Guard put the total cost for implementing the
regulations laid out by Congress in the 2002 Maritime Transportation Security Act at $7.5 billion over 10
years.”
$7 billion to put 100,000 police officers on the nation’s streets: “The Community Oriented Policing
Services (COPS) Program: An Overview,” Congressional Research Service, April 6, 2003. President
Clinton initiated the COPS program and funded it at $1.4 billion per year from 1996 to 1999.
$5 billion to purchase state-of-the-art baggage screening machines. “Airport meets plans for bomb
screening,” The Manchester Union Leader, July 23, 2004. The cost for installing integrated systems into
the nation’s airports is estimated at $5 billion. The Bush administration is requesting only $250 million
this year for the equipment.
$4 billion to expedite modernization of the Coast Guard. “Coast Guard Fleet Upgrades Need Big Cash Anchor,
Senators Tell White House,” Jeremy Torobin, Congressional Quarterly, November 14, 2003.
$3 billion to secure major roads and rails: Winning the War on Terror, House Select Homeland Security
Committee, Democratic Staff, April 23, 2004, page 38. The report concludes that providing a baseline of
passenger security to the nation’s top 50 metropolitan areas would cost $2 billion. The report can be found
at: http://www.house.gov/hsc/democrats/pdf/press/report2/WinningtheWaronTerror.pdf.
$2.5 billion to increase funding for fire departments. “Fire Grant Reauthorization would triple funding
for big-city departments,” Congressional Quarterly, May 13, 2004. President Bush requested $500 million
in FY05 for the program, a drop from the $750 million in FY04.
$2.25 billion to expedite the work of the Nunn-Lugar Threat Reduction program. According to Public
Law 108-87, the FY04 Defense budget, provides $450 million requested for the Nunn-Lugar threat
reduction program.
$2 billion to improve cargo security: “Testimony of Michael O’Hanlon before the Senate Governmental
Affairs Committee,” March 20, 2003. According to O’Hanlon, an additional $1 billion to $2 billion is
needed for inspecting cargo in the United States. His testimony can be found at:
http://www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/032003ohanlon.htm.
$775 million for fighting the war of ideas. Winning the War on Terror, House Select Homeland Security
Committee, Democratic Staff, April 23, 2004, pages 25 and 55. Estimates tripling the budget for NED to
cost $80 million and cites the current budget for public diplomacy toward the Arab and Muslim world at
$25 billion a year.
$350 million for integrating emergency radio systems nationwide. “Price Tag for Emergency Radio Integration is
$350 million, Says a Raytheon Chief,” Alice Lipowicz, Congressional Quarterly, April 20, 2004.
$240 million to equip airports with walk-through explosive detectors. “9/11 Panel Urges Firmer Security Grip,”
Richardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Los Angeles Times, July 29, 2004.